| Metric | Pillar | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Does The Entity Have Any Project Related To Reducing Green House Gas Emission | Emissions |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Indicate If Any Independent Assessment Or Evaluation Or Assurance Has Been Carried Out By An External Agency For Air Emissions Other Than GHGEmissions | Emissions |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Total Scope 1 And Scope 2 Emissions Intensity In Term Of Physical Output | Emissions |
4.19
↓ 4.6% (-0)
|
4.39
|
—
|
| Total Scope 1 And Scope 2 Emissions Intensity Per Rupee Of Turnover | Emissions |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Total Scope 1 And Scope 2 Emissions Intensity Per Rupee Of Turnover Adjusted For Purchasing Power Parity | Emissions |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Total Scope 1 And Scope 2 Emissions Intensity The Relevant Metric May Be Selected By The Entity | Emissions |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Total Scope 1 Emissions | Emissions |
1,085,239
↓ 4.2% (-47,624)
|
1,132,863
|
—
|
| Total Scope 2 Emissions | Emissions |
6,667
↓ 75.3% (-20,292)
|
26,959
|
—
|
| Total Scope 3 Emission Intensity The Relevant Metric May Be Selected By The Entity | Emissions |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Total Scope 3 Emissions | Emissions |
16,940
↓ 28.6% (-6,791)
|
23,731
|
—
|
| Total Scope 3 Emissions Per Rupee Of Turnover | Emissions |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Whether Any Independent Assessment Or Evaluation Or Assurance Has Been Carried Out By An External Agency For Total Scope 3 Emissions | Emissions |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether Any Indicate If Any Independent Assessment Or Evaluation Or Assurance Has Been Carried Out By An External Agency For Green House Gas Emissions | Emissions |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether Details Of Air Emissions Other Than Ghg Emissions By The Entity Is Applicable To The Company | Emissions |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether Details Of Green House Gas Emissions And Its Intensity Is Applicable To The Company | Emissions |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether Total Scope 3 Emissions And Its Intensity Is Applicable To The Company | Emissions |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Energy Consumption Through Other Sources From Non Renewable Sources | Energy |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Energy Consumption Through Other Sources From Renewable Sources | Energy |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Energy Intensity In Term Of Physical Output | Energy |
71.61
↑ 2.2% (+2)
|
70.08
|
—
|
| Energy Intensity Per Rupee Of Turnover | Energy |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Energy Intensity Per Rupee Of Turnover Adjusting For Purchasing Power Parity | Energy |
0.02
— 0.0% (0)
|
0.02
|
—
|
| Energy Intensity The Relevant Metric May Be Selected By The Entity | Energy |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Total Electricity Consumption From Non Renewable Sources | Energy |
349,477
↑ 155.7% (+212,785)
|
136,692
|
—
|
| Total Electricity Consumption From Renewable Sources | Energy |
20,658
↑ 9.4% (+1,777)
|
18,881
|
—
|
| Total Energy Consumed From Non Renewable Sources | Energy |
18,612,582
↑ 0.7% (+130,655)
|
18,481,927
|
—
|
| Total Energy Consumed From Renewable And Non Renewable Sources | Energy |
18,633,240
↑ 0.7% (+132,432)
|
18,500,808
|
—
|
| Total Energy Consumed From Renewable Sources | Energy |
20,658
↑ 9.4% (+1,777)
|
18,881
|
—
|
| Whether Any Independent Assessment Or Evaluation Or Assurance Has Been Carried Out By An External Agency For Energy Consumption Under Leadership Indicators | Energy |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether Details Of Total Energy Consumption And Energy Intensity Applicable To The Company | Energy |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Complaints On POSHUp Held | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Complaints on directors conflict of interest (count) | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Consumer Complaints Pending Resolution At End Of Year | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Consumer Complaints Received During The Year | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Directors with disciplinary actions (count) | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Does The Entity Have ASpecified Committee Of The Board Or Director Responsible For Decision Making On Sustainability Related Issues | Governance |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Employees with disciplinary actions (count) | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| KMPs with disciplinary actions (count) | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Median Of Remuneration Or Salary Or Wages Of Board Of Directors | Governance |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Median Of Remuneration Or Salary Or Wages Of Employees Other Than Bod And KMP | Governance |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Board Of Directors For Remuneration Or Salary Or Wages | Governance |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Complaints Filed During The Year | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Number Of Complaints Filed From Stake Holder Group During The Year | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Number Of Complaints Pending From Stake Holder Group Resolution At The End Of Year | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Number Of Complaints Pending Resolution At The End Of Year | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Number Of Complaints Received In Relation To Issues Of Conflict Of Interest Of The KMPs | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Number Of Employees Other Than Bod And KMPFor Remuneration Or Salary Or Wages | Governance |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Female Board Of Directors | Governance |
1
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Complaints In Respect Of Number Of Employees Or Worker | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Female Board Of Directors | Governance |
0.13
|
—
|
—
|
| Remark For Consumer Complaints | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Remarks In Case Complaints Received In Relation To Issues Of Conflict Of Interest Of The Kmps | Governance |
NA
|
NA
|
—
|
| Remarks Stake Holder Group From Whom Complaint Is Received | Governance |
NA
|
NA
|
—
|
| Remarks on directors conflict of interest complaints | Governance |
NA
|
NA
|
—
|
| Remarksfor Complaints Explanatory Text Block | Governance |
The complaints were lodged near the end of the financial year and are currently being addressed within the Company’s stipulated resolution period.
|
The complaints were lodged near the end of the financial year and are currently being addressed within the Company’s stipulated resolution period.
|
—
|
| Total Complaints Reported Under Sexual Harassment Of Women At Workplace | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Total Number Of Board Of Directors | Governance |
8
|
—
|
—
|
| Workers with disciplinary actions (count) | Governance |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| ABrief On Types Of Customers Explanatory Text Block | Other |
IMFA’s customers are mainly manufacturers of stainless steel that require ferro chrome. Our clientele also includes international traders.
|
—
|
—
|
| Address Of Corporate Office Of Company | Other |
IMFA Building, Bomikhal, Rasulgarh, Bhubaneswar-751 010, Odisha
|
—
|
—
|
| Address Of Registered Office Of Company | Other |
IMFA Building, Bomikhal, Rasulgarh, Bhubaneswar-751 010, Odisha
|
—
|
—
|
| Amount Of Accounts Payable During The Year | Other |
86,886.43
↑ 0.3% (+276)
|
86,610.85
|
—
|
| Amount Of Compounding Fee | Other |
350,000
|
—
|
—
|
| Amount Of Cost Incurred On Well Being Measures | Other |
6.76
↑ 9.9% (+1)
|
6.15
|
—
|
| Amount Of Investments In Related Parties | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Amount Of Loans And Advances Given To Related Parties | Other |
0
↓ 100.0% (-22)
|
21.73
|
—
|
| Amount Of Purchases From Related Parties | Other |
47.98
↑ 23.2% (+9)
|
38.93
|
—
|
| Amount Of Purchases From Top Ten Trading Houses | Other |
367.33
↓ 11.9% (-50)
|
416.9
|
—
|
| Amount Of Purchases From Trading Houses | Other |
367.33
↓ 11.9% (-50)
|
416.9
|
—
|
| Amount Of Re Used | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Amount Of Recycled | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Amount Of Safely Disposed | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Amount Of Sales To Dealers Or Distributors | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Amount Of Sales To Related Parties | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Amount Of Sales To Top Ten Dealers Or Distributors | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Amount Of Total Investments | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Amount Of Total Loans And Advances | Other |
0
↓ 100.0% (-273)
|
273.3
|
—
|
| Amount Of Total Purchases | Other |
1,366.81
↓ 1.5% (-20)
|
1,387.21
|
—
|
| Amount Of Total Purchases For Share Of Related Party Transactions | Other |
1,366.81
↓ 1.5% (-20)
|
1,387.21
|
—
|
| Amount Of Total Purchases From Trading Houses | Other |
367.33
↓ 11.9% (-50)
|
416.9
|
—
|
| Amount Of Total Sales | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Amount Of Total Sales For Share Of Related Party Transactions | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Amount Of Total Sales To Dealers Or Distributors | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Amount Spent For CSRProjects Undertaken | Other |
18,715,966
|
—
|
—
|
| Amounts Paid To PAFs | Other |
17,014,489
|
—
|
—
|
| Are The Premises Or Offices Of The Entity Accessible To Differently Abled Employees And Workers | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Aspirational District Of CSRProjects Undertaken | Other |
Rayagada
|
—
|
—
|
| Average Number Of Female Employees Or Workers At The Beginning Of The Year And As At End Of The Year | Other |
505
↑ 12.0% (+54)
|
451
|
—
|
| Battery Waste | Other |
16.9
↑ 144.6% (+10)
|
6.91
|
—
|
| Bio Medical Waste | Other |
0.01
— 0.0% (0)
|
0.01
|
—
|
| Brief Of The Monetary Case For Compounding Fee Explanatory Text Block | Other |
Violation of Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013
|
—
|
—
|
| CSRProject | Other |
Environment Protection
|
—
|
—
|
| Category Of Company | Other |
Subsidiary
|
—
|
—
|
| Channels Of Communication | Other |
Other
|
—
|
—
|
| Compliance With Statutory Requirements Of Relevance To The Principles And Rectification Of Any Non Compliances Frequency | Other |
Quarterly
|
—
|
—
|
| Compliance With Statutory Requirements Of Relevance To The Principles And Rectification Of Any Non Compliances Indicate Whether Review Was Undertaken By | Other |
Director
|
—
|
—
|
| Construction And Demolition Waste | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Contact Number Of Contact Person | Other |
9,777,575,659
|
—
|
—
|
| Corporate Identity Number | Other |
L27101OR1961PLC000428
|
—
|
—
|
| Corrective Action Taken For Initiative | Other |
NA
|
—
|
—
|
| Cost Of Goods Or Services Procured During The Year | Other |
1,444.5
↓ 1.5% (-23)
|
1,467
|
—
|
| Date Of End Of Financial Year | Other |
2025-03-31
|
—
|
—
|
| Date Of End Of Previous Year | Other |
2024-03-31
|
—
|
—
|
| Date Of End Of Prior To Previous Year | Other |
2023-03-31
|
—
|
—
|
| Date Of Incorporation | Other |
1961-11-20
|
—
|
—
|
| Date Of Start Of Financial Year | Other |
2024-04-01
|
—
|
—
|
| Date Of Start Of Previous Year | Other |
2023-04-01
|
—
|
—
|
| Date Of Start Of Prior To Previous Year | Other |
2022-04-01
|
—
|
—
|
| Deducted And Deposited With The Authority | Other |
Yes
|
Yes
|
—
|
| Description Of Business Activity | Other |
Metal and Metal Products
|
—
|
—
|
| Description Of Main Activity | Other |
Manufacturing
|
—
|
—
|
| Description Of The Risk Or Concern | Other |
Water Management
|
—
|
—
|
| Details Of Any Corrective Action Taken Or Underway On Issues Related To Fines Or Penalties Or Action Taken By Regulators Or Law Enforcement Agencies Or Judicial Institutions On Cases Of Corruption And C~19 c 7 f 5 b 3 | Other |
This is not applicable as there are no instances of corruption or conflict of interest.
|
—
|
—
|
| Details Of Any Corrective Actions Taken Or Underway On Issues Relating To Advertising And Delivery Of Essential Services Or Cyber Security And Data Privacy Or Recalls Or Penalty Or Action Taken By Regul~5861 bc 5 c | Other |
NA
|
—
|
—
|
| Details Of Any Corrective Actions Taken Or Underway To Address Significant Risks Or Concerns Arising From The Assessments Of Plant And Office Explanatory Text Block | Other |
There were no significant risks/concerns arising from the assessments.
|
—
|
—
|
| Details Of Any Corrective Actions Taken Or Underway To Address Significant Risks Or Concerns Arising From The Assessments Of Value Chain Partner Explanatory Text Block | Other |
NA
|
—
|
—
|
| Details Of Impact Of Data Breaches Explanatory Text Block | Other |
NA
|
—
|
—
|
| Details Of Improvements In Environmental And Social Impacts Due To RAnd D | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Details Of Other Channels Of Communication | Other |
• E-mails • Meetings • Telephonic conversation • Website • Video call
|
—
|
—
|
| Details Of Other Frequency Of Engagement | Other |
Continous
|
—
|
—
|
| Details Of The Highest Authority Responsible For Implementation And Oversight Of The Business Responsibility Policy Explanatory Text Block | Other |
Mr. Subhrakant Panda, Managing Director
|
—
|
—
|
| Did Your Entity Carry Out Any Survey With Regard To Consumer Satisfaction Relating To The Major Products Or Services Of The Entity Significant Locations Of Operation Of The Entity Or The Entity As AWhole | Other |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Disclose Any Significant Adverse Impact To The Environment Arising From The Value Chain Of The Entity What Mitigation Or Adaptation Measures Have Been Taken By The Entity In This Regard Explanatory Text Block | Other |
Nil
|
—
|
—
|
| Disclose Wages Paid To Persons Employed | Other |
30.73
↑ 708.7% (+27)
|
3.8
|
—
|
| District Of Project | Other |
Jajpur
|
—
|
—
|
| Do Human Rights Requirements Form Part Of Your Business Agreements And Contracts | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Do The Employees Or Worker Of The Entity Have Access To Non Occupational Medical And Healthcare Services | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Do The Enlisted Policies Extend To Your Value Chain Partners | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Do You Have AFocal Point Responsible For Addressing Human Rights Impacts Or Issues Caused Or Contributed To By The Business | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Do You Have APreferential Procurement Policy Where You Give Preference To Purchase From Suppliers Comprising Marginalized Or Vulnerable Groups | Other |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Does Company Participate In The Business Responsibility Initiatives Of The Listed Entity | Other |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Does The Entity Display Product Information On The Product Over And Above What Is Mandated As Per Local Laws | Other |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Does The Entity Extend Any Life Insurance Or Any Compensatory Package In The Event Of Death Of Employees | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Does The Entity Extend Any Life Insurance Or Any Compensatory Package In The Event Of Death Of Workers | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Does The Entity Have ABusiness Continuity And Disaster Management Plan | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Does The Entity Have AFramework Or Policy On Cyber Security And Risks Related To Data Privacy | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Does The Entity Have An Anti Corruption Or Anti Bribery Policy | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Does The Entity Have An Equal Opportunity Policy As Per The Rights Of Persons With Disabilities Act 2016 | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Does The Entity Have Any Sites Or Facilities Identified As Designated Consumers Under The Performance Achieve And Trade Scheme Of The Government Of India | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Does The Entity Have Procedures In Place For Sustainable Sourcing | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Does The Entity Have Processes In Place To Avoid Or Manage Conflict Of Interests Involving Members Of The Board | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Does The Entity Provide Transition Assistance Programs To Facilitate Continued Employability And The Management Of Career Endings Resulting From Retirement Or Termination Of Employment | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| EMail Of Contact Person | Other |
bijayanandamohapatra@imfa.in
|
—
|
—
|
| EMail Of The Company | Other |
mail@imfa.in
|
—
|
—
|
| EWaste | Other |
1.95
↓ 9.3% (-0)
|
2.15
|
—
|
| Environmental And Social Parameters Relevant To The Product As APercentage To Total Turnover | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Financial Implications Of The Risk Or Opportunity | Other |
Positive Implications
|
—
|
—
|
| Frequency Of Engagement | Other |
Others – please specify
|
—
|
—
|
| Grievance Redressal Mechanism In Place | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Gross Wages Paid To Female | Other |
5.38
↑ 79.3% (+2)
|
3
|
—
|
| Has An Appeal Been Preferred For Compounding Fee | Other |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Has The Entity Carried Out Independent Assessment Evaluation Of The Working Of Its Policies By An External Agency | Other |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Has The Entity Conducted Life Cycle Perspective Or Assessments For Any Of Its Products Or For Its Services | Other |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Has The Entity Implemented AMechanism For Zero Liquid Discharge | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Has The Policy Been Approved By The Board | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Hazardous Air Pollutants | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| High Consequence Work Related Injury Or Ill Health Excluding Fatalities | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| In Case Of Risk Approach To Adapt Or Mitigate | Other |
IMFA undertakes CSR projects in the field of Healthcare, Community education, water & sanitation and women empowerment.
|
—
|
—
|
| Indicate Whether Risk Or Opportunity | Other |
O
|
—
|
—
|
| Initiative Undertaken | Other |
Installation of Variable Frequency Drives
|
—
|
—
|
| Is The Entity Compliant With The Applicable Environmental Law | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Is The Premise Or Office Of The Entity Accessible To Differently Abled Visitors As Per The Requirements Of The Rights Of Persons With Disabilities Act 2016 | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Is There AMechanism Available To Receive And Redress Grievances For Other Than Permanent Employees | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Is There AMechanism Available To Receive And Redress Grievances For Other Than Permanent Workers | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Is There AMechanism Available To Receive And Redress Grievances For Permanent Employees | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Is There AMechanism Available To Receive And Redress Grievances For Permanent Workers | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Is There AMechanism Available To Receive And Redress Grievances For The Following Categories Of Employees And Worker | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Location Of Operations Or Offices | Other |
Greenfield project at Therubali
|
—
|
—
|
| Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate Per One Million Person Hours Worked | Other |
0.2
↓ 41.2% (-0)
|
0.34
|
—
|
| Material Issue Identified | Other |
Risk Management & Control
|
—
|
—
|
| Median Of Remuneration Or Salary Or Wages Of Key Managerial Personnel | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Median Of Remuneration Or Salary Or Wages Of Workers | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| NGRBCPrinciple For Compounding Fee | Other |
Principle 1
|
—
|
—
|
| NICCode Of Product Or Service Sold By The Entity | Other |
27,110
|
—
|
—
|
| NOx | Other |
876.75
↑ 0.5% (+4)
|
872.33
|
—
|
| Name Of Contact Person | Other |
Bijayananda Mohapatra
|
—
|
—
|
| Name Of Product Or Service | Other |
Ferro Chrome
|
—
|
—
|
| Name Of Project For Which Rehabilitation And Resettlement Is On Going | Other |
High Carbon Ferro Chrome Project, Kalinga Nagar
|
—
|
—
|
| Name Of Stock Exchange Where The Company Is Listed | Other |
NSE
|
—
|
—
|
| Name Of The Company | Other |
Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Limited
|
—
|
—
|
| Name Of The Holding Or Subsidiary Associate Companies Or Joint Ventures | Other |
IMFA Alloys Finlease Limited
|
—
|
—
|
| Name Of The National And International Codes Or Certifications Or Labels Or Standards Adopted By Your Entity And Mapped To Each Principle Explanatory Text Block | Other |
ISO 9001: 2008
|
—
|
—
|
| Name Of The Regulatory Or Enforcement Agencies Or Judicial Institutions For Compounding Fee | Other |
RD Eastern Region, Kolkata
|
—
|
—
|
| Name Of The Trade And Industry Chambers Or Associations | Other |
Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO)
|
—
|
—
|
| Net Worth | Other |
23,222,900,000
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Affiliations With Trade And Industry Chambers Or Associations | Other |
7
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Countries Where Market Served By The Entity | Other |
12
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Days Of Accounts Payable | Other |
P60D
|
P59D
|
—
|
| Number Of Dealers Or Distributors To Whom Sales Are Made | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Number Of Differently Abled Employees Or Workers | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Employees Covered As Percentage Of Total Employees | Other |
1
— 0.0% (0)
|
1
|
—
|
| Number Of Employees Covered As Percentage Of Total Worker | Other |
1
— 0.0% (0)
|
1
|
—
|
| Number Of Employees Or Whose Family Members Rehabilitated And Placed In Suitable Employment | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Number Of Employees Or Worker For Performance And Career Development | Other |
1,248
↓ 2.3% (-29)
|
1,277
|
—
|
| Number Of Employees Or Workers Are Part Of Associations Or Union | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Number Of Employees Or Workers Covered For Provided Training On Human Rights Issues | Other |
119
↓ 33.5% (-60)
|
179
|
—
|
| Number Of Employees Or Workers Including Differently Abled | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Employees Or Workers Related To Minimum Wages | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Number Of Fatalities | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Number Of Female Key Management Personnel | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Forced Recalls | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Green Credits Have Been Generated Or Procured By The Listed Entity | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Green Credits Have Been Generated Or Procured By The Top Ten Value Chain Partners | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Instances Of Data Breaches Along With Impact | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Key Managerial Personnel For Remuneration Or Salary Or Wages | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Locations | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Persons Benefitted From CSRProjects | Other |
900
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Project Affected Families | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of States Where Market Served By The Entity | Other |
10
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Trading Houses Where Purchases Are Made | Other |
3
— 0.0% (0)
|
3
|
—
|
| Number Of Trained Employees Or Workers | Other |
1,031
↑ 9.4% (+89)
|
942
|
—
|
| Number Of Voluntary Recalls | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Well Being Of Employees Or Workers | Other |
493
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Workers For Remuneration Or Salary Or Wages | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Number Of Workers Or Whose Family Members Rehabilitated And Placed In Suitable Employment | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Other Hazardous Waste | Other |
6,752.96
↑ 3.0% (+200)
|
6,553.42
|
—
|
| Other Non Hazardous Waste Generated | Other |
1,995,196.9
↓ 34.2% (-1,037,704)
|
3,032,900.42
|
—
|
| Outcome Of The Initiative | Other |
Reduce in energy consumption.
|
—
|
—
|
| Particulate Matter | Other |
627.5
↑ 31.5% (+150)
|
477.36
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Beneficiaries From Vulnerable And Marginalized Groups | Other |
0.3
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Capex | Other |
0.07
↑ 16.7% (+0)
|
0.06
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Child Labour Of Value Chain Partners P 5 | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Child Labour Of Your Plants And Offices That Were Assessed P 5 | Other |
0.75
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Contribution Of Exports In The Total Turnover Of The Entity | Other |
0.91
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Cost Incurred On Well Being Measures With Respect To Total Revenue Of The Company | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Data Breaches Involving Personally Identifiable Information Of Customers | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Differently Abled Employees Or Workers | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Directly Sourced From MSMEs Or Small Producers | Other |
0.07
↓ 53.3% (-0)
|
0.15
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Discrimination At Work Place Of Value Chain Partners P 5 | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Discrimination At Work Place Of Your Plants And Offices That Were Assessed P 5 | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Employees Or Worker For Performance And Career Development | Other |
1
— 0.0% (0)
|
1
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Employees Or Workers Are Part Of Associations Or Union Of Total Number Of Employee | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Employees Or Workers Covered For Provided Training On Human Rights Issues | Other |
0.02
↓ 85.7% (-0)
|
0.14
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Employees Or Workers Including Differently Abled | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Employees Or Workers Related To Minimum Wages | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Female Key Management Personnel | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Forced Labour Or Involuntary Labour Of Value Chain Partners P 5 | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Forced Labour Or Involuntary Labour Of Your Plants And Offices That Were Assessed P 5 | Other |
0.75
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Gross Wages Paid To Female To Total Wages Paid | Other |
0.02
↑ 100.0% (+0)
|
0.01
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Health And Safety Practices Of Value Chain Partners P 3 | Other |
1
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Health And Safety Practices Of Your Plants And Offices That Were Assessed P 3 | Other |
1
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Inputs Were Sourced Sustainably | Other |
0.71
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Job Creation | Other |
0.14
↑ 600.0% (+0)
|
0.02
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Loans And Advances Given To Related Parties In Total Loans And Advances | Other |
—
|
0.08
|
—
|
| Percentage Of PAFs Covered By Rehabilitation And Resettlement | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Persons In Respective Category Covered By The Awareness Programmes | Other |
0.3
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Purchases From Related Parties In Total Purchases For Share Of Related Party Transactions | Other |
0.04
↑ 33.3% (+0)
|
0.03
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Purchases From Top Ten Trading Houses In Total Purchases From Trading Houses | Other |
1
— 0.0% (0)
|
1
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Purchases From Trading Houses In Total Purchases For Concentration Of Purchases | Other |
0.27
↓ 10.0% (-0)
|
0.3
|
—
|
| Percentage Of RAnd D | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Sexual Harassment Of Value Chain Partners P 5 | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Sexual Harassment Of Your Plants And Offices That Were Assessed P 5 | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Shares Held By Listed Entity | Other |
0.76
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Sourced Directly From Within The District And Neighbouring Districts | Other |
0.67
↑ 6.3% (+0)
|
0.63
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Total Turnover For Business Activities | Other |
1
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Total Turnover For Product Or Service Sold | Other |
1
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Trained Employees Or Workers | Other |
0.83
↑ 12.2% (+0)
|
0.74
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Value Chain Partners By Value Of Business Done With Such Partners That Were Assessed For Environmental Impacts | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Wages Of Value Chain Partners P 5 | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Wages Of Your Plants And Offices That Were Assessed P 5 | Other |
0.75
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Well Being Of Employees Or Workers | Other |
0.11
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Working Conditions Of Value Chain Partners P 3 | Other |
1
|
—
|
—
|
| Percentage Of Working Conditions Of Your Plants And Offices That Were Assessed P 3 | Other |
1
|
—
|
—
|
| Performance Against Above Policies And Follow Up Action Frequency | Other |
Quarterly
|
—
|
—
|
| Performance Against Above Policies And Follow Up Action Indicate Whether Review Was Undertaken By | Other |
Director
|
—
|
—
|
| Performance Of The Entity Against The Specific Commitments Goals And Targets Along With Reasons In Case The Same Are Not Met Explanatory Text Block | Other |
Not Applicable
|
—
|
—
|
| Persistent Organic Pollutants | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Plastic Waste | Other |
43.88
↓ 52.0% (-47)
|
91.33
|
—
|
| Product Or Service Sold By The Entity | Other |
Ferro Chrome
|
—
|
—
|
| Purpose And Scope Of Engagement Including Key Topics And Concerns Raised During Such Engagement | Other |
• Ensure compliance with statutory, health, and safety requirements. • Foster long-lasting, sustainable relationships with stakeholders.
|
—
|
—
|
| Radioactive Waste | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Rationale For Identifying The Risk Opportunity | Other |
Ash and slag produced during operations are environmental pollutants.
|
—
|
—
|
| Reach Of Trade And Industry Chambers Or Associations | Other |
National
|
—
|
—
|
| Reasons For Forced Recall | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Reasons For Voluntary Recall | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Recycling And Or Safe Disposal As APercentage To Total Turnover | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Reporting Boundary | Other |
Standalone basis
|
—
|
—
|
| Retention Rates Permanent Employees That Took Parental Leave | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Retention Rates Permanent Workers That Took Parental Leave | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Return To Work Rate Permanent Employees That Took Parental Leave | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Return To Work Rate Permanent Workers That Took Parental Leave | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Revenue From Operations | Other |
25,645,735,016
↓ 7.8% (-2,155,902,656)
|
27,801,637,672
|
—
|
| SOx | Other |
1,626.49
↓ 11.7% (-216)
|
1,842.58
|
—
|
| Safe And Responsible Usage As APercentage To Total Turnover | Other |
0
|
—
|
—
|
| Stakeholder Group | Other |
Value Chain Partners
|
—
|
—
|
| State Of CSRProjects Undertaken | Other |
Odisha
|
—
|
—
|
| State Of Project | Other |
Odisha
|
—
|
—
|
| Telephone Of Company | Other |
0674-2611000
|
—
|
—
|
| Topics Or Principles Covered Under The Training And Its Impact | Other |
• Better WE • Awareness Sessions on Ethics, Accountability & Good Governance at Workplace • Navigating Gender Diversity & Professional Conduct • Awareness Sessi...
|
—
|
—
|
| Total Fuel Consumption From Non Renewable Sources | Other |
18,263,105
↓ 0.4% (-82,130)
|
18,345,235
|
—
|
| Total Fuel Consumption From Renewable Sources | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Total Number Of Affected Employees | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Total Number Of Affected Workers | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Total Number Of Employees Or Workers For Membership | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Total Number Of Employees Or Workers For Performance And Career Development | Other |
1,248
↓ 2.3% (-29)
|
1,277
|
—
|
| Total Number Of Employees Or Workers For Training On Human Rights Issues | Other |
5,603
↑ 338.8% (+4,326)
|
1,277
|
—
|
| Total Number Of Key Management Personnel | Other |
2
|
—
|
—
|
| Total Number Of Training And Awareness Programs Held | Other |
18
|
—
|
—
|
| Total Recordable Work Related Injuries | Other |
2
↓ 33.3% (-1)
|
3
|
—
|
| Total Revenue Of The Company | Other |
2,564.57
↓ 7.8% (-216)
|
2,780.17
|
—
|
| Total Wage Cost | Other |
217.91
↑ 6.6% (+14)
|
204.33
|
—
|
| Total Wages Paid | Other |
217.93
↑ 6.7% (+14)
|
204.31
|
—
|
| Total Waste Disposed | Other |
2,001,255.94
↓ 33.8% (-1,020,671)
|
3,021,927.05
|
—
|
| Total Waste Generated | Other |
2,002,012.6
↓ 34.1% (-1,037,542)
|
3,039,554.24
|
—
|
| Total Waste Recovered | Other |
6,587
↑ 1.8% (+118)
|
6,469
|
—
|
| Turnover | Other |
25,422,634,314
|
—
|
—
|
| Turnover Rate | Other |
0.07
— 0.0% (0)
|
0.07
— 0.0% (0)
|
0.07
|
| Type Of Operations | Other |
120 KLD Grain based Ethanol plant
|
—
|
—
|
| Value Of Shares Paid Up | Other |
539,541,060
|
—
|
—
|
| Volatile Organic Compounds | Other |
0
↓ 100.0% (-9)
|
9
|
—
|
| Waste Disposed By Incineration | Other |
1.24
↓ 26.6% (-0)
|
1.69
|
—
|
| Waste Disposed By Landfilling | Other |
1,615,872.57
↓ 37.4% (-965,649)
|
2,581,521.91
|
—
|
| Waste Disposed By Other Disposal Operations | Other |
385,382.13
↓ 12.5% (-55,021)
|
440,403.45
|
—
|
| Waste Intensity In Term Of Physical Output | Other |
7.69
↓ 33.2% (-4)
|
11.51
|
—
|
| Waste Intensity Per Rupee Of Turnover | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Waste Intensity Per Rupee Of Turnover Adjusting For Purchasing Power Parity | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Waste Intensity The Relevant Metric May Be Selected By The Entity | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Waste Recovered Through Other Recovery Operations | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Waste Recovered Through Re Used | Other |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Waste Recovered Through Recycled | Other |
6,587
↑ 1.8% (+118)
|
6,469
|
—
|
| Web Link At Anti Corruption Or Anti Bribery Policy Is Place | Other |
https://elegant-canvas ad15652696.media.strapiapp.com/code_ce0a7409b2.pdf
|
—
|
—
|
| Web Link For Details Of Initiative Taken By Entity | Other |
Installation of Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) for RA fan motor operations to optimize energy usage
|
—
|
—
|
| Web Link For Grievance Redress Policy | Other |
All contracts with Value Chain Partners have a clause that describes how to escalate grievances
|
—
|
—
|
| Web Link Of The Policies Explanatory Text Block | Other |
https://www.imfa.in/pdfs/code.pdf https://www.imfa.in/pdfs/CSR-Policy.pdf
|
—
|
—
|
| Weblink Where Information On Products And Services Of The Entity Can Be Accessed Explanatory Text Block | Other |
Information regarding our product can be accessed on our website-https://www.imfa.in.
|
—
|
—
|
| Website Of Company | Other |
www.imfa.in
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether An Occupational Health And Safety Management System Has Been Implemented By The Entity | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether Any Independent Assessment Or Evaluation Or Assurance Has Been Carried Out By An External Agency For Waste Management | Other |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether CSRIs Applicable As Per Section 135 Of Companies Act 2013 | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether Extended Producer Responsibility Is Applicable To The Entity SActivities | Other |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether Identified As Vulnerable And Marginalized Group | Other |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether Stakeholder Consultation Is Used To Support The Identification And Management Of Environmental And Social Topics | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether The Company Has Undertaken Assessment Or Assurance Of The BRSRCore | Other |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether The Conditions Of Environmental Approval Or Clearance Are Being Complied With | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether The Entity Has Translated The Policy Into Procedures | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether You Have Processes For Workers To Report The Work Related Hazards And To Remove Themselves From Such Risks | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| Whether Your Entitys Policy Or Policies Cover Each Principle And Its Core Elements Of The NGRBCs | Other |
Yes
|
—
|
—
|
| External assurance on water withdrawal (Yes/No) | Water |
No
|
—
|
—
|
| Total Volume Of Water Consumption | Water |
4,074,688
↓ 11.2% (-516,393)
|
4,591,081
|
—
|
| Total Volume Of Water Withdrawal | Water |
4,531,190
↓ 20.6% (-1,175,826)
|
5,707,016
|
—
|
| Total Water Discharged In Kilolitres | Water |
456,502
↓ 59.1% (-659,433)
|
1,115,935
|
—
|
| Water Discharge By Sent To Third Parties | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Discharge By Sent To Third Parties With Treatment | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Discharge By Sent To Third Parties Without Treatment | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Discharge To Others | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Discharge To Others With Treatment | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Discharge To Others Without Treatment | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Discharge To Seawater | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Discharge To Seawater With Out Treatment | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Discharge To Seawater With Treatment | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Intensity In Term Of Physical Output | Water |
15.66
↓ 9.9% (-2)
|
17.38
|
—
|
| Water Intensity Per Rupee Of Turnover | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Intensity Per Rupee Of Turnover Adjusting For Purchasing Power Parity | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Intensity The Relevant Metric May Be Selected By The Entity | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Withdrawal By Groundwater | Water |
156,080
↑ 3.6% (+5,376)
|
150,704
|
—
|
| Water Withdrawal By Others | Water |
566,635
↓ 62.5% (-943,465)
|
1,510,100
|
—
|
| Water Withdrawal By Seawater Or Desalinated Water | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water Withdrawal By Surface Water | Water |
3,808,475
↓ 5.9% (-237,737)
|
4,046,212
|
—
|
| Water Withdrawal By Third Party Water | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water discharge to groundwater | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water discharge to groundwater (treated) | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water discharge to groundwater (untreated) | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Water discharge to surface water | Water |
456,502
↓ 59.1% (-659,433)
|
1,115,935
|
—
|
| Water discharge to surface water (treated) | Water |
456,502
↓ 59.1% (-659,433)
|
1,115,935
|
—
|
| Water discharge to surface water (untreated) | Water |
0
|
0
|
—
|
| Whether Any Independent Assessment Or Evaluation Or Assurance Has Been Carried Out By An External Agency For Water Discharged | Water |
No
|
—
|
—
|
Compare History: Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Limited | ESG Comparison
India ESG compliance directory and ingestion monitor